My Top 5 Picks from The 59th American Society of Cytopathology MeetingBy: Jana Sullinger, MD On: Sat 14 of Apr., 2012 00:35 MDT (2539 Reads)
by The Populist Cytologist
In case you weren't able to attend the 59th Annual ASC meeting in November 2011, CytoJournal? has published abstracts from the finalized poster-platform sessions. I am sharing my top 5 picks from this list which peaked my interest. Please feel free to post a particular abstract you found interesting by posting a comment.
Selected Abstracts from CytoJournal? 2011 8(1):16-16
These are peer-reviewed poster-platform submissions finalized by the Scientific Program Committee. A total of 153 abstracts (14 Platforms PP1 through PP14 & 139 Posters 1 through 139) were selected from 161 submissions to be considered for presentation during November 4 - 8, 2011, at the Hilton Baltimore Hotel, to pathologists, cytopathologists, cytotechnologists, residents, fellows, students, and other members of cytopathology-related medical and scientific fields.
The Tahoe Study: Bias in interpretation of Pap tests when HPV ...: This is a CAP Cytopathology Committee group study, written by Moriarty, et. al. evaluating the what impact, if any, known HPV status has on Pap smear interpretations. The study found that known HPV status does affect the Pap test interpretation, and was statistically significant. The authors concluded that "if molecular testing is used as a primary screening test and Pap tests are used as secondary or reflex tests, it is more likely that the Pap test will be interpreted as abnormal, as compared to when a Pap test is used as a primary screening test.
The content on this page is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.