Fullscreen
Loading...
 

General Discussion Help

Forums > General Discussion > Billing for FNA Adequacy

Billing for FNA Adequacy


posts: 3 1 stars user offline United States

I'm looking for some references that will allow my lab to bill Technical Charges for cytotechnologist performed adequacy assessments on FNA's. AMA and CAP are in disagreement with ASC regarding the use of the 88172 code.

Due to the advise of AMA's "CPT Advisor" software, most labs and hospitals are not billing for this service although it may be perfectly legal and reasonable to do so.

Are any of your facilities currently billing, successfully for this service when it is provide by the cytotechnologist, under the general supervision of a pathologist, for an adequacy assessment (not a diagnosis)?

Thanks,

Steve Feher



admin posts: 330 5 stars user offline United States

Steve....I have to admit, it has been awhile since I was in a hospital based environment, but I will share my experience from both the academic and private community setting. I confess, that in my academic situation, cytotechnologists essentially functioned as first line triage, by performing a rapid assessment of sample adequacy PRIOR to calling for the staff pathologist to come view the sample and render any additional information to the clinician. So, in that scenario, the 88172 would be utilized, and on final interpretation the 88173. I envision this is the scenario that CAP/AMA are referring to.

In the community hospital setting, I would think it is the exception, rather than the rule, that there are hospital based cytotechnologists even available to perform a rapid assessment, as the pathologist, in my experience, is performing this solo, unless we are talking about a rather large community hospital. Of course in that scenario, as you describe, they would be available. Again, in my experience, the cytotechnologist is not providing the interpretation of the rapid assessment, but helping prep the sample and calling the pathologist when an adequate sample is available for evaluation as a rapid assessment. I am hopeful someone else can provide some useful feedback on this topic. You raise a very good question.


Show posts:
Jump to forum:

Search Wiki Page

Exact match

CYTOPATHNET Polls

Do you plan to adopt the Bethesda Guidelines for Thyroid Cytology?






Code of Conduct

We comply with the HONcode standard for health trust worthy information:
verify here.

Theme: Tikinewt

TikiWiki assistant

Thank you for installing Tikiwiki!

LoginTo begin configuring Tiki, please login as admin.

The Tikiwiki CommunityTo learn more, visit: http://tiki.org.

Tikiwiki DocumentationFor help, visit http://doc.tiki.org.

Upcoming events

1)  Mon 12 of May, 2014
National Cytotechnology Day

Online users

160 online users

Search PubMed

PubMed Logo
Search PubMed:   

Shoutbox

kucingz2 points , 01:52 MDT, Mon 21 of Apr., 2014: [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]
admin, 21:24 MST, Wed 22 of Feb., 2012: User registration enhancements made and more coming in future.
admin, 18:06 MST, Sun 29 of Jan., 2012: Site upgraded from 6.4 to 6.6.
admin, 21:56 MDT, Thu 06 of Oct., 2011: Not sure I totally understand question. Perhaps post to forums for feedback.
savco68 points , 08:04 MDT, Wed 21 of Sep., 2011: if you do breast FNA and interpret as adequate but you do 2 pass and put it straight for CB would you bill for it ?

Random Image

thumbnail
AGC-prob AIS_sp_11032009_5.jpg
Gallery: Gynecologic (GYN) Cytology

Google Search

 
cytopathnet.org
WWW

Site Language: English